FAQ: Why do I spend so much time focused on adults when supporting youth-adult partnerships?

Adults interested in youth engagement often think the bulk of the work in building youth-adult shared decision making will focus on the youth. However, I see more of the crucial work happening with the adults in the organization.

I have found that the barriers to youth-adult partnership often arise from adults. Overcoming three barriers typically fills much of my early focus with organizations: adultism, bureaucracy and comfort in professional spaces. Once adults open supportive seats at the decision-making table to youth, I find that youth are ready to fill those spaces.

Adultism

This “-ism” joins the collection of implicit biases we all carry, and we can limit their power over our behavior with intentional, conscientious focus. As my colleague Khalid Samarrae of the W. Haywood Burns Institute once so clearly laid out for me, we adults received training as children and youth that our voices were not valuable and we would have to earn our seat at the table through age and experience. Having finally earned our seats, we now repeat that training to a new generation of children and youth.

We also hesitate to let go of what power we have earned. Our perception that we worked hard to earn that power, whether or not leavened by recognizing that our status as adults confers an inherent privilege, makes us fear parting with it.

Bureaucracy

Bureaucracy may be the hidden menace to all good collaboration. It once took me a year to remove purely bureaucratic barriers to paying youth for participation on an advisory body. I also had to once stop efforts to engage incarcerated youth in a juvenile justice advisory body because the detention facility’s rules required them to wear shackles while in the room.

Recognizing that bureaucracy can have value protecting institutions and individuals, we must continually ask ourselves how do we reduce delays, paperwork, and chains of command to the minimum required to accomplish that protection.

Assumed Comfort in Professional Spaces

Adults spend a lot of time in meetings, writing emails, and speaking in the various codes of our respective professions. We also assume our peers around the table share similar skills. On the other hand, youth spend a lot of time in classrooms, exploring and developing passions, and with peers in person or online. When we bring youth into the adult-centered spaces of meetings and work, we need to make those spaces less adult-centered and more inclusive.

Adults can overcome these barriers to shared decisionmaking by intentionally recognizing and shifting away from adultist behavior, taking a critical eye toward bureaucracy, and building more inclusive collaborative tables.

Inclusion Decision Tree

This video walks you through a simple tool to help determine if your organization includes affected people in its decisions. While I mostly use policy-making for examples here, the Inclusion Decision Tree is useful in diverse situations by any organization hoping to make more effective decisions.

I was honored to originally record this for the Pretrial Justice Institute’s Pi-Con.

FAQ: Should organizations pay youth to serve on councils, boards, or other decision-making bodies?

Rule of thumb: Pay youth if adults receive pay for the same or equivalent work.

Youth should be paid when serving on a board with adults who serve on the board in their professional capacity. If adult are paid, including because service on the board or council is part of their jobs, then youth should also receive a wage.

Why should organizations pay youth?

Youth do receive several benefits from serving on councils, boards, and the like, including professional networks, valuable experience, and resume or college application material. However, paying youth when adults are paid demonstrates that the organization places equal value on the adults’ and young people’s time, expertise and contributions.

In addition, and perhaps even more importantly, paying youth means that youth don’t have to decide between serving on your board for free or working those hours at a job. For many youth, paid work is a necessity to cover their own expenses and to contribute to the family income. You increase your chances of engaging diverse youth voices if you give youth who need income that opportunity through your board.

For these reasons, organizations may also choose to pay youth even if adults in equivalent positions are not paid or no adults serve in equivalent positions.

This series of FAQ posts covers my answers to common questions about youth engagement.